Do we know what goo it is? Cause there is like a billion * different goos. Goddam phone
03/15/2016 07:55:11
You would meme lynch you filthy memer
03/15/2016 07:55:21
03/15/2016 07:55:21
This might come off the wrong way but perhaps lynching off townies with negative utilities be somewhat beneficial..? I know this sounds bad but let me explain.
Also there's no need to do it right now cos it has little impact.
But a couple hypotheticals:
Invisi's theory of having to be the first to vote means that we'd have to unvote first and allow him to vote first which buys mafia more time to plan, come up with excuses etc. Plus with invisi being busy recently, if we decide to start lynching someone it looks like it's going to be a long process of waiting for him to vote first, for us to the continue to lynch (especially if we need his vote for the majority).
Also for Ghost..
If he is one of the last people still alive, his 'having to vote 6 people a day' thing might result inevitably lynching someone who is at L-1 that we want to pressure. Idk it seems like that with him in the game it'd be safer to play it slow, let him get his votes out of the way. But at the same time wait to pressure people seriously.
Just putting things out there. I say we still pressure inactive people for now.
Your thoughts?
03/15/2016 07:55:53
Also there's no need to do it right now cos it has little impact.
But a couple hypotheticals:
Invisi's theory of having to be the first to vote means that we'd have to unvote first and allow him to vote first which buys mafia more time to plan, come up with excuses etc. Plus with invisi being busy recently, if we decide to start lynching someone it looks like it's going to be a long process of waiting for him to vote first, for us to the continue to lynch (especially if we need his vote for the majority).
Also for Ghost..
If he is one of the last people still alive, his 'having to vote 6 people a day' thing might result inevitably lynching someone who is at L-1 that we want to pressure. Idk it seems like that with him in the game it'd be safer to play it slow, let him get his votes out of the way. But at the same time wait to pressure people seriously.
Just putting things out there. I say we still pressure inactive people for now.
Your thoughts?
03/15/2016 07:55:53
Urisk said:
You would meme lynch you filthy memer
MrL said:
This might come off the wrong way but perhaps lynching off townies with negative utilities be somewhat beneficial..? I know this sounds bad but let me explain.
Also there's no need to do it right now cos it has little impact.
But a couple hypotheticals:
Invisi's theory of having to be the first to vote means that we'd have to unvote first and allow him to vote first which buys mafia more time to plan, come up with excuses etc. Plus with invisi being busy recently, if we decide to start lynching someone it looks like it's going to be a long process of waiting for him to vote first, for us to the continue to lynch (especially if we need his vote for the majority).
Also for Ghost..
If he is one of the last people still alive, his 'having to vote 6 people a day' thing might result inevitably lynching someone who is at L-1 that we want to pressure. Idk it seems like that with him in the game it'd be safer to play it slow, let him get his votes out of the way. But at the same time wait to pressure people seriously.
Just putting things out there. I say we still pressure inactive people for now.
Your thoughts?
This isn't a bad observation MrL. Especially with some roles that are distinctly bad for the town like Jezmo's "Aerodrome/Princess Peach" role last game, skipping the day. Day is the only way townies can communicate (unless there's Masons, which may be a possibility in this game) and there wouldn't be a lynch.
I don't think the ghostbone thing is doing bad to the town now, but yes it may be a nuisance later in the game. Unless he's bullshitting and putting on the act. I've never heard of such a role. But then again...
LEF
03/15/2016 08:02:13
cAKE said:
Dean made me an innocent child because I am le best small child.
sorry wooy if my swearing offended you.
Also anyone in favour of a no lynch should automatically be suspected as scum. Even if we do hit a townie, there's still Atyeo's stats in game 2 with the increased chance of hitting mafia thing. I suggest you new players to go back and read that (who is new actually).
Night's gonna be word for town. Even weirder than night 1 last game. So many power roles floating around it's gonna be a sticky situation (get it, goo!)
I'm all for lynching laggy for the meme
Um, is this a joke? I'm not going to vote someone for swearing.
Vote: Unvote
MrL said:
This might come off the wrong way but perhaps lynching off townies with negative utilities be somewhat beneficial..? I know this sounds bad but let me explain.
Also there's no need to do it right now cos it has little impact.
But a couple hypotheticals:
Invisi's theory of having to be the first to vote means that we'd have to unvote first and allow him to vote first which buys mafia more time to plan, come up with excuses etc. Plus with invisi being busy recently, if we decide to start lynching someone it looks like it's going to be a long process of waiting for him to vote first, for us to the continue to lynch (especially if we need his vote for the majority).
Also for Ghost..
If he is one of the last people still alive, his 'having to vote 6 people a day' thing might result inevitably lynching someone who is at L-1 that we want to pressure. Idk it seems like that with him in the game it'd be safer to play it slow, let him get his votes out of the way. But at the same time wait to pressure people seriously.
Just putting things out there. I say we still pressure inactive people for now.
Your thoughts?
This is a good idea as Mafia aren't going to kill negative utilities, and we avoid the risk of hitting an important power role. However, it doesn't really give us a better chance of hitting scum as these players are already confirmed town, whereas voting for others will.
03/15/2016 08:07:48
Vote: Invisi
03/15/2016 08:11:18
03/15/2016 08:11:18
I don't see much of an issue with Ghost, not even a hypothetical one. He could theoretically get all of his votes out of the way in like, a minute. I suppose it could potentially be an issue, but it's pretty unlikely.
Ever lynching either Invisi or Ghost just based on those negative traits seems pretty silly. If they do have those traits they're almost certainly town, and if they are town, we wouldn't want to lynch them because they're very strong players.
Personally, I would highly doubt that in a game where LEF has crafted some of the roles, some players would be left with only a small, binary, unimportant trait. That's just conjecture, though.
03/15/2016 08:11:44
Ever lynching either Invisi or Ghost just based on those negative traits seems pretty silly. If they do have those traits they're almost certainly town, and if they are town, we wouldn't want to lynch them because they're very strong players.
Personally, I would highly doubt that in a game where LEF has crafted some of the roles, some players would be left with only a small, binary, unimportant trait. That's just conjecture, though.
03/15/2016 08:11:44
Wooy said:Didn't ghost say he had a power role but he also had that shitposter thing. I might be wrong its been a long day.
cAKE said:
Dean made me an innocent child because I am le best small child.
sorry wooy if my swearing offended you.
Also anyone in favour of a no lynch should automatically be suspected as scum. Even if we do hit a townie, there's still Atyeo's stats in game 2 with the increased chance of hitting mafia thing. I suggest you new players to go back and read that (who is new actually).
Night's gonna be word for town. Even weirder than night 1 last game. So many power roles floating around it's gonna be a sticky situation (get it, goo!)
I'm all for lynching laggy for the meme
Um, is this a joke? I'm not going to vote someone for swearing.
Vote: Unvote
MrL said:
This might come off the wrong way but perhaps lynching off townies with negative utilities be somewhat beneficial..? I know this sounds bad but let me explain.
Also there's no need to do it right now cos it has little impact.
But a couple hypotheticals:
Invisi's theory of having to be the first to vote means that we'd have to unvote first and allow him to vote first which buys mafia more time to plan, come up with excuses etc. Plus with invisi being busy recently, if we decide to start lynching someone it looks like it's going to be a long process of waiting for him to vote first, for us to the continue to lynch (especially if we need his vote for the majority).
Also for Ghost..
If he is one of the last people still alive, his 'having to vote 6 people a day' thing might result inevitably lynching someone who is at L-1 that we want to pressure. Idk it seems like that with him in the game it'd be safer to play it slow, let him get his votes out of the way. But at the same time wait to pressure people seriously.
Just putting things out there. I say we still pressure inactive people for now.
Your thoughts?
This is a good idea as Mafia aren't going to kill negative utilities, and we avoid the risk of hitting an important power role. However, it doesn't really give us a better chance of hitting scum as these players are already confirmed town, whereas voting for others will.
03/15/2016 08:12:58
Getting rid of negative utilities right now doesn't do anything helpful to us. I would also ask that if there are any more negative utility roles, that you don't reveal so the mafia have a higher chance of hitting a less useful role.
03/15/2016 08:13:31
03/15/2016 08:13:31
Yeah, you guys have a good point actually.
It's worse than no lynch, as we are almost guarenteed to hit town.
03/15/2016 08:15:57
It's worse than no lynch, as we are almost guarenteed to hit town.
03/15/2016 08:15:57
Jezmo said:
I don't see much of an issue with Ghost, not even a hypothetical one. He could theoretically get all of his votes out of the way in like, a minute. I suppose it could potentially be an issue, but it's pretty unlikely.
Ever lynching either Invisi or Ghost just based on those negative traits seems pretty silly. If they do have those traits they're almost certainly town, and if they are town, we wouldn't want to lynch them because they're very strong players.
Personally, I would highly doubt that in a game where LEF has crafted some of the roles, some players would be left with only a small, binary, unimportant trait. That's just conjecture, though.
Yeah with eighteen power roles there's got be a few awful ones. After all, there's confirmed Goo in this game so we're pretty much playing a Bastards game.
03/15/2016 08:16:16
Windkeeper0 said:That's a very good point.
Getting rid of negative utilities right now doesn't do anything helpful to us. I would also ask that if there are any more negative utility roles, that you don't reveal so the mafia have a higher chance of hitting a less useful role.
As Wooy (I think?) said, atleast ghost seems to have something else of use too so he can still be very useful. Also as jezmo pointed out, it's not very intrusive and will have little impact in the long run but still something to be weary of.
03/15/2016 08:24:49
The easiest way to theorize about whether or not a random lynch is good is just looking at the next day and what info you get. no lynch is pretty guaranteed dead townies, unless somehow an sk get's lucky for us or someone has a real nice power play role. So what, we know who's who now? At best, we lose annoying roles, and someone fucks up and gives something away. I don't buy a no lynch, at the risk of sounding like mafia. Until somebody comes up with some sort of theory about who's who
Vote: Boozer
03/15/2016 08:34:04
Vote: Boozer
03/15/2016 08:34:04
Hey friend, any particular reason your voting for me? Maybe you saw me say i might be useful and want to prevent that from happening? ;O cap pls ur lookin pretty suss rn
03/15/2016 08:48:50
03/15/2016 08:48:50
idk youv'e said nothing helpful so far.
maybe voting for you will get you to say something a bit more useful.
Vote: Boozer
03/15/2016 08:54:30
maybe voting for you will get you to say something a bit more useful.
Vote: Boozer
03/15/2016 08:54:30
Cus you're closest to being lynched, and if i vote for someone else, we risk somebody not getting lynched. You still got time to make a claim on someone else.
03/15/2016 08:59:27
03/15/2016 08:59:27
Vote: Boozer
I think Boozer is now L-3.
03/15/2016 08:59:35
I think Boozer is now L-3.
03/15/2016 08:59:35
not to interrupt the boozer bandwagon but I'd like to ask Invisi what his role name is, not necessarily the pokemon you are but your actual role. You didn't mention that in your post and I don't think I've heard of that role.
03/15/2016 09:03:17
03/15/2016 09:03:17
Oh, just a heads up, everyone should be aware of possible roles such as hammerer when casting votes.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Hammerer
03/15/2016 09:04:32
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Hammerer
03/15/2016 09:04:32
Lets be real other people have contributed even less so its pretty trigger happy to just bandwagon vote me cmon frondos
03/15/2016 09:06:26
03/15/2016 09:06:26
Windkeeper0 said:"Town Shitposter" is a thing. LEF said he'd make roles up.
not to interrupt the boozer bandwagon but I'd like to ask Invisi what his role name is, not necessarily the pokemon you are but your actual role. You didn't mention that in your post and I don't think I've heard of that role.
I don't think Cameron is mafia at this point, so I don't think pressuring him is going to get us anywhere.
03/15/2016 09:09:52
I can't see anyone who looks like mafia atm, unless ghost is an absolute genius and he made his role up.
03/15/2016 09:17:17
03/15/2016 09:17:17
Aerodrome said:I don't think Cameron is mafia at this pointAny reason in particular?
03/15/2016 09:18:01
dean said:It's my "read Cameron like a 3rd grade textbook" skill.
Aerodrome said:I don't think Cameron is mafia at this pointAny reason in particular?
03/15/2016 09:19:35
not all of us have the privilege of being cameron's girlfriend :c
03/15/2016 09:22:57
03/15/2016 09:22:57